Tuesday, March 24, 2026

When “Next Generation” Isn’t Enough

I came late to Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 — and now Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024.

Before making that jump, I had already invested heavily — time, effort, and not an insignificant amount of money — into Microsoft Flight Simulator X (FSX) and Lockheed Martin Prepar3D (P3D). 

That ecosystem, while aging, had something increasingly rare today: it worked. Consistently. Predictably. Reliably.

And I was happy!

The move to the new generation was supposed to be a clear step forward. In some respects, it absolutely is. The visuals are extraordinary. The world feels alive in a way we could only imagine a decade ago.

But here’s the uncomfortable part: a better-looking simulator is not necessarily a better simulator for all conditions.

This morning, I ran into these videos.  I'll let them speak for themselves.

MSFS 2024 Should Be Better Than This

A closer look at AeroflyFS

Aerofly FS 4 Review 2026 – The Smoothest VR Flight Sim? First Impressions vs MSFS


More videos like this The Flying Doctor

Looks like I have more investigating to do.  That said, I wouldn't rule out an AeroflyFS installation sometime in the near future.

Your thoughts,

Kenneth (Ken) Butterly

No comments:

Post a Comment

Convergence

Two established data sets. One reinforcing signal. The State of Flight Training 2026 from Redbird Flight Simulations  continues to describe ...